Comments on: LocalMessageSender with retry capability http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-retry-capability/ Reverse Engineering Life Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:11:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Pradeep http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-retry-capability/comment-page-1/#comment-5969 Pradeep Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:08:56 +0000 http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-retry-capability/#comment-5969 Good comments mashe. Thanks for the insights. 1. Yes I think that can be done. I will try to make the changes and post the code. 2. Don't you think the maxRetryCount works like a circuit breaker ? 3. Generally methods are PascalCased in C#. The method that you specified is an eventhandler and the convention for an event handler is object_EventName. Here the object that raises the event is messageSender and the event is SendCompleted. So Visual Studio by default will create a method named messageSender_SendCompleted. It is an inconsistency, I agree, but I think people are used to seeing this in C#. Good comments mashe. Thanks for the insights.

1. Yes I think that can be done. I will try to make the changes and post the code.

2. Don’t you think the maxRetryCount works like a circuit breaker ?

3. Generally methods are PascalCased in C#. The method that you specified is an eventhandler and the convention for an event handler is object_EventName. Here the object that raises the event is messageSender and the event is SendCompleted. So Visual Studio by default will create a method named messageSender_SendCompleted. It is an inconsistency, I agree, but I think people are used to seeing this in C#.

]]> By: Binil Thomas http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-retry-capability/comment-page-1/#comment-5965 Binil Thomas Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:09:11 +0000 http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-retry-capability/#comment-5965 Few notes: 1. Can RetryMessageSender be implemented as a decorator of LocalMessageSender? I mean, can the client program against an interface without knowing if retrying decorator is added or not? 2. Instead of blind retries, would you want something more sophisticated like a circuit breaker? See http://timross.wordpress.com/2008/02/10/implementing-the-circuit-breaker-pattern-in-c/ 3. What is the method naming standard in C#? I am curious about method names like messageSender_SendCompleted which are bothCamelCase_andDashed Few notes:

1. Can RetryMessageSender be implemented as a decorator of LocalMessageSender? I mean, can the client program against an interface without knowing if retrying decorator is added or not?

2. Instead of blind retries, would you want something more sophisticated like a circuit breaker? See http://timross.wordpress.com/2008/02/10/implementing-the-circuit-breaker-pattern-in-c/

3. What is the method naming standard in C#? I am curious about method names like messageSender_SendCompleted which are bothCamelCase_andDashed

]]>