Comments on: LocalMessageSender with strongly typed objects http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-strongly-typed-objects/ the colors of my life Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:04:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Pradeep http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-strongly-typed-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5968 Pradeep Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:03:56 +0000 http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-strongly-typed-objects/#comment-5968 You know what, mashe, I was thinking of doing the exact same thing. I will get to it soon. You know what, mashe, I was thinking of doing the exact same thing. I will get to it soon.

]]> By: Binil Thomas http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-strongly-typed-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5966 Binil Thomas Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:17:30 +0000 http://pradeepc.net/blog/2009/11/25/localmessagesender-with-strongly-typed-objects/#comment-5966 This repeats the seriazation/deserialization lines all over the codebase. Is is possible to create higher level senders/receivers which natively knows how to do this serialization? class TypedMessageSender implements IMessageSender { public TypedMessageSender(IMessageSender rawSender) { .. } public void sendObject(T obj) { rawSender.send(serialize(obj)); } } This repeats the seriazation/deserialization lines all over the codebase. Is is possible to create higher level senders/receivers which natively knows how to do this serialization?

class TypedMessageSender implements IMessageSender {
public TypedMessageSender(IMessageSender rawSender) { .. }

public void sendObject(T obj) {
rawSender.send(serialize(obj));
}
}

]]>